Dec. 29, 2024

2024 Comedy Specials Not on the Best Of List - and WHY

2024 Comedy Specials Not on the Best Of List - and WHY

In this episode, Johnny Mac discusses a variety of comedy specials that did not make his top list of the year. He explains his criteria for ranking, noting the importance of originality and genuine humor. The specials mentioned include works by Jo...

Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player badge
PocketCasts podcast player badge
Overcast podcast player badge
Castro podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconPocketCasts podcast player iconOvercast podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

In this episode, Johnny Mac discusses a variety of comedy specials that did not make his top list of the year. He explains his criteria for ranking, noting the importance of originality and genuine humor. The specials mentioned include works by Jo Koy, Pete Davidson, Jackie Novak, Kevin James, Rory Scovel, Neil Brennan, Jenny Slate, Nikki Glaser, Anthony Jeselnik, James Acaster, Jim Gaffigan, and Jamie Foxx.

Johnny emphasizes that his list is subjective and encourages listeners to share their thoughts in the Daily Comedy News podcast Facebook group.


00:26 Criteria for Comedy Specials
01:10 Specials That Didn't Make the List
01:27 Detailed Reviews of Notable Specials

Unlock an ad-free podcast experience with Caloroga Shark Media! Get all our shows on any player you love, hassle free! For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus. No plug-ins needed! You also get 20+ other shows on the network ad-free!

This podcast supports Podcasting 2.0 if you’d like to support the show via value for value and stream some sats!

https://linktr.ee/dailycomedynews

Contact John at john@thesharkdeck dot com

John’s free substack about the media: Media Thoughts is mcdpod.substack.com

DCN on Threads: https://www.threads.net/@dailycomedynews

You can also support the show at www.buymeacoffee.com/dailycomedynews

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/daily-comedy-news--4522158/support.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.200 --> 00:00:10.839
Callaroga Shark Media. Be there. I'm shunning back with your

2
00:00:10.919 --> 00:00:13.000
daily comedy news. If you've listened last few days. This

3
00:00:13.039 --> 00:00:14.839
is two days ago I did my top specials of

4
00:00:14.880 --> 00:00:17.640
the year. Yesterday I did the next best specials of

5
00:00:17.640 --> 00:00:19.800
the year, and today is and I want to keep

6
00:00:19.800 --> 00:00:22.280
it positive, but today are some specials that are just

7
00:00:22.800 --> 00:00:25.160
not on the list. Some of them I liked a lot,

8
00:00:25.280 --> 00:00:27.079
but just not on the list as so as I

9
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:29.399
make the list. Tier A are the things that I

10
00:00:29.440 --> 00:00:32.719
feel like just nailed it, like really funny comedian trying

11
00:00:32.759 --> 00:00:35.880
to do something not just as special by the numbers,

12
00:00:35.920 --> 00:00:38.600
just it's got that little certain something. Then the next

13
00:00:38.600 --> 00:00:40.880
group of things like you know Seth Meyers doing Seth

14
00:00:40.920 --> 00:00:42.679
Meyers things and if you're sitting on a couch for

15
00:00:42.719 --> 00:00:45.880
an hour, fine solid special, you laugh, but like there's

16
00:00:45.920 --> 00:00:48.280
nothing special about it. Well the capital lests, you know

17
00:00:48.320 --> 00:00:51.159
what I mean. And then today are some other things

18
00:00:51.200 --> 00:00:54.000
and I'll share with you why they didn't make the list.

19
00:00:54.280 --> 00:00:56.280
And I'm all proud of myself. After having weeks of

20
00:00:56.359 --> 00:00:58.600
voice trouble, my voice is pretty strong today. This is

21
00:00:58.640 --> 00:01:01.000
the third podcast in a row because I've done all

22
00:01:01.000 --> 00:01:03.200
these list episodes back to back to back, and I've

23
00:01:03.200 --> 00:01:05.680
got my large iced coffee with caramel and Millik can

24
00:01:05.719 --> 00:01:07.280
go to buy me a coffee. Dot com slash Daily

25
00:01:07.280 --> 00:01:09.640
Company News to support the show, but voices holding up,

26
00:01:09.680 --> 00:01:12.480
which is good right. Not on the list, and there's

27
00:01:12.599 --> 00:01:17.799
no particular order to this list. Maybe a slight chronological

28
00:01:17.840 --> 00:01:19.799
as something came out and I added it to the bottom,

29
00:01:19.799 --> 00:01:22.879
But don't read anything into the order in which I

30
00:01:23.000 --> 00:01:26.480
discuss the following specials that are not on the list.

31
00:01:26.879 --> 00:01:30.480
Not on the list Adrian Applelucci's Derk Queen, and I wrote,

32
00:01:30.519 --> 00:01:33.719
I didn't buy the premises of the jokes. They felt

33
00:01:33.760 --> 00:01:36.319
like all untrue premises. I'll compare that to Ronnie Ching.

34
00:01:36.879 --> 00:01:42.599
Ronnie has that big opening sweep about freezing his wife's eggs,

35
00:01:43.000 --> 00:01:46.560
clearly told for comedic effect, but I believe the underlying story,

36
00:01:46.599 --> 00:01:49.400
whereas with Adrian, I just didn't believe anything she was

37
00:01:49.439 --> 00:01:51.480
saying and it takes me out of it. I need

38
00:01:51.680 --> 00:01:53.879
something to be at least a little bit reality based,

39
00:01:53.959 --> 00:01:57.239
unless you're going like full Stephen Wright. Not on the list.

40
00:01:57.480 --> 00:02:02.519
Ali Wong's single Lady for Me. You know not all

41
00:02:02.519 --> 00:02:06.159
comedian is targeted at a fifty five year old Mary

42
00:02:06.239 --> 00:02:09.599
dude sitting in a basement with kids recording a podcast.

43
00:02:09.639 --> 00:02:11.879
You know, I'm not the target audience there, so I

44
00:02:11.919 --> 00:02:13.919
wasn't feeling it at all. Doesn't mean it's bad, doesn't

45
00:02:13.919 --> 00:02:15.560
mean it's not funny, doesn't mean you won't like it.

46
00:02:15.639 --> 00:02:17.960
Just not on my list. And I can't say this

47
00:02:18.080 --> 00:02:20.360
enough times. It's just one dude's list. Let's not get

48
00:02:20.400 --> 00:02:22.879
angry about the list. The list doesn't made to make

49
00:02:22.919 --> 00:02:26.039
people feel bad, doesn't mean anything. What it really means

50
00:02:26.080 --> 00:02:29.840
is John wanted to take three days off after Christmas,

51
00:02:29.879 --> 00:02:32.360
and everybody else puts out lists, so why shouldn't I.

52
00:02:32.439 --> 00:02:35.240
That's what this really means. Also not on the list

53
00:02:35.639 --> 00:02:38.360
Joe Coy, Yeah, he had a special this year, remember

54
00:02:38.360 --> 00:02:41.319
that one? No me neither. I wrote down all energy,

55
00:02:41.639 --> 00:02:45.520
no jokes. Very disappointing by Joe Coy. Perhaps Taylor Swift

56
00:02:45.599 --> 00:02:48.520
really rattled his game. Who knows. Not on the list

57
00:02:48.719 --> 00:02:51.879
Ronny Yusef's HBO special from March, and I wrote I

58
00:02:51.879 --> 00:02:55.280
didn't like the direction. I couldn't focus. I know some

59
00:02:55.319 --> 00:02:57.919
folks have had this on their top tens, but just

60
00:02:57.960 --> 00:03:00.520
the way it was edited kept taking me out of it.

61
00:03:00.919 --> 00:03:04.080
You know, comedy directors, how about you shoot the camera

62
00:03:04.280 --> 00:03:07.280
at the comedian and you leave it there. I'm getting old,

63
00:03:07.319 --> 00:03:09.319
but all this fast cut stuff I just don't like.

64
00:03:10.000 --> 00:03:12.680
Ronny had weird lighting, so the direction just ruined it

65
00:03:12.680 --> 00:03:15.319
for me. The material might be amazing, but I don't know.

66
00:03:15.360 --> 00:03:18.800
I bailed. Pete Davidson had a Netflix special in January.

67
00:03:18.840 --> 00:03:22.639
Remember that one. I wrote terrible and then I wrote

68
00:03:22.680 --> 00:03:26.680
even more damning fake laughs question mark. That was a

69
00:03:26.719 --> 00:03:28.840
note I had on a lot of specials this year

70
00:03:28.960 --> 00:03:31.800
that because of what I do for a living. I've

71
00:03:31.840 --> 00:03:35.719
worked in radios professionally since ninety two in college radio

72
00:03:35.759 --> 00:03:38.360
before that. I've listened to a lot of audio over

73
00:03:38.360 --> 00:03:42.080
the years, and weird edits will get my attention. Even

74
00:03:42.159 --> 00:03:44.759
Ronnie Chang special, which I loved early on, there's some

75
00:03:44.800 --> 00:03:47.400
weird video jumps that I was like, Eh, that didn't

76
00:03:47.439 --> 00:03:50.759
seem natural, But as I watched Pete, I felt like

77
00:03:50.840 --> 00:03:53.719
they added laughs and boy, there's nothing more damning than

78
00:03:53.719 --> 00:03:57.520
that Jackie Novak Get on your Knees on Netflix in January.

79
00:03:57.560 --> 00:03:59.439
I've seen that on a lot of other people's top

80
00:03:59.479 --> 00:04:03.039
ten lists. I lasted four minutes with that special, and

81
00:04:03.560 --> 00:04:06.039
like I said earlier, not every specials targeted at me

82
00:04:06.719 --> 00:04:10.039
wasn't for me. You might like it. Kevin James, irregardless

83
00:04:10.159 --> 00:04:13.639
was on Amazon in January. I lasted seven minutes. He

84
00:04:13.719 --> 00:04:16.399
was doing this weird dancing thing and no thanks. I'm out.

85
00:04:16.879 --> 00:04:20.040
Rory Scovell had one on Max and I wrote the

86
00:04:20.079 --> 00:04:23.600
same note I did with Pete. The laughter has me suspicious.

87
00:04:23.720 --> 00:04:26.480
And if I don't trust that you haven't added laughter,

88
00:04:26.560 --> 00:04:29.040
I don't trust your special and I'm out. I have

89
00:04:29.120 --> 00:04:32.639
that same note about Neil Brennan's Netflix special back in April,

90
00:04:32.680 --> 00:04:36.240
I wrote, material was good, but fake laughs. Just don't

91
00:04:36.279 --> 00:04:38.720
do that. Four specials that came and went, I have

92
00:04:38.800 --> 00:04:41.959
no note on them. Donalll Rawlings Netflix February, Jenny Slate

93
00:04:42.040 --> 00:04:46.160
Amazon February, Steve Travino Netflix in March, Liz Neely on

94
00:04:46.160 --> 00:04:49.839
YouTube in April. Nikki Glazer is HBO special. I've seen

95
00:04:50.079 --> 00:04:52.759
some people put her way up on the list. I

96
00:04:52.800 --> 00:04:55.720
think she crushed at Tom Brady, but I didn't think

97
00:04:55.759 --> 00:04:59.639
that special was all that. Again, maybe I'm not the

98
00:04:59.680 --> 00:05:01.439
target audience for it, but I watched that. I was like,

99
00:05:01.439 --> 00:05:05.399
all right, I mean it's fine, it's fine. I'm not

100
00:05:05.439 --> 00:05:07.079
gonna throw a pie at you if you like it,

101
00:05:07.120 --> 00:05:11.759
but it's fine. Some more specials not on Johnny Max's list. Again,

102
00:05:11.759 --> 00:05:13.839
I can't say enough. It's just a list. Let's not

103
00:05:13.839 --> 00:05:16.720
get upset about it. I'm just talking. Hada Einemander had

104
00:05:16.720 --> 00:05:19.199
a special on Max and I wrote, is she even

105
00:05:19.199 --> 00:05:21.519
a good stand up? Boy? It must have been craiky

106
00:05:21.600 --> 00:05:24.079
when I wrote that one down, but that's what I wrote.

107
00:05:24.199 --> 00:05:25.800
It's not how I feel right now, but I did

108
00:05:25.839 --> 00:05:27.959
write that sentence A looking at my note right here

109
00:05:28.120 --> 00:05:31.439
under other projects best of twenty twenty four, and it

110
00:05:31.480 --> 00:05:34.040
says is she even a good stand up? Question work?

111
00:05:34.600 --> 00:05:36.959
Ron In Hirschberg had a special on YouTube. I wrote

112
00:05:37.040 --> 00:05:42.160
generic comedian, Generic comedy. Christina Catherine Martinez had how to

113
00:05:42.160 --> 00:05:44.879
Make a Cake and I wrote weird and not funny,

114
00:05:44.959 --> 00:05:47.920
and I usually like weird. Natasha vain Blatt had one

115
00:05:47.959 --> 00:05:50.839
on YouTube and I wrote, it's fine, nothing special. Dan

116
00:05:50.920 --> 00:05:53.759
Licatta for the Boys on YouTube, but his old high school.

117
00:05:54.000 --> 00:05:56.439
I saw what he was trying to do. He went

118
00:05:56.439 --> 00:05:58.560
back to his old high school. He got some teenagers

119
00:05:58.600 --> 00:06:01.959
in the audience, but there's like a fake teacher being like,

120
00:06:02.040 --> 00:06:03.959
you shouldn't be doing that kind of material, Like I

121
00:06:04.000 --> 00:06:06.160
see what he's trying to do, but it just didn't work.

122
00:06:06.759 --> 00:06:10.600
I actually wrote the sentence not good Hannah Berner July Netflix.

123
00:06:10.680 --> 00:06:13.319
I just wrote not for me again, some specials are

124
00:06:13.360 --> 00:06:16.399
not for me. All good, Langston Kerman in August on Netflix,

125
00:06:16.439 --> 00:06:20.839
I wrote fine, Anthony Jessnick Netflix in November, I lasted

126
00:06:21.079 --> 00:06:24.759
seven minutes and found it not funny. I have seen

127
00:06:24.800 --> 00:06:28.160
people on the intergwebs disagree with that sentiment, but I

128
00:06:28.199 --> 00:06:32.959
don't know. I just wasn't feeling it. And maybe the

129
00:06:32.959 --> 00:06:36.480
whole Jessinic character is cooked now, and I don't know

130
00:06:36.519 --> 00:06:39.040
where he would go from here unless he just did

131
00:06:39.079 --> 00:06:41.319
a total different pivot and became a different kind of

132
00:06:41.319 --> 00:06:44.279
stand up. So I don't know. Also that week James

133
00:06:44.319 --> 00:06:47.839
Acaster's HBO special, and I wrote, I'm not sure what

134
00:06:47.920 --> 00:06:51.079
he's doing. The premise there was that hecklers were allowed

135
00:06:51.120 --> 00:06:54.639
to interrupt him. Okay, good premise, and then maybe you

136
00:06:54.639 --> 00:06:57.199
should have some hecklers in the show if that's the premise.

137
00:06:57.240 --> 00:06:59.240
So I don't know what. I know what he was

138
00:06:59.279 --> 00:07:02.000
trying to do, but he didn't do it. Jim Gaffigan

139
00:07:02.040 --> 00:07:04.480
had a special in November on Hului lead off of

140
00:07:04.519 --> 00:07:08.879
the hilarious specials, and I wrote boring Jim doing Jim things.

141
00:07:09.319 --> 00:07:12.040
Jim had a pretty good year, you know, the SNL

142
00:07:12.079 --> 00:07:15.360
thing helped him a lot. He has stepped up in classes,

143
00:07:15.399 --> 00:07:18.759
I like to say, but I don't know. He's had

144
00:07:18.800 --> 00:07:20.720
some pretty good specials. But this one was just like,

145
00:07:20.759 --> 00:07:23.040
all right, Jim kind of heard this already, so we're

146
00:07:23.079 --> 00:07:25.199
to But if you're Jim Gaffigan, what do you do

147
00:07:25.240 --> 00:07:26.680
this far in? Like, do you come out and just

148
00:07:26.720 --> 00:07:29.879
do like the I'm gonna rant against Trump special for

149
00:07:29.920 --> 00:07:32.319
an hour and then lose your audience? So you just

150
00:07:32.319 --> 00:07:34.839
come out and tell more Dad jokes and just do

151
00:07:34.959 --> 00:07:37.600
that for another twenty years and retire. Probably the latter,

152
00:07:37.720 --> 00:07:41.040
But all right, my former coworker, Jamie Fox, I almost

153
00:07:41.199 --> 00:07:45.839
bailed really early. Then he did a very good Cat

154
00:07:45.839 --> 00:07:48.959
Williams impression, which kept me. But then he went into

155
00:07:49.000 --> 00:07:52.360
a preachy part that to me seems like it was

156
00:07:52.439 --> 00:07:56.480
added in later. It seemed to me like the audio

157
00:07:56.560 --> 00:07:59.040
from the theater was too dead, and it was a

158
00:07:59.120 --> 00:08:01.120
close up of Jim, So that makes me think they

159
00:08:01.160 --> 00:08:03.079
shot it in an empty theater and dropped that in later.

160
00:08:03.399 --> 00:08:04.920
I say that because I feel like somebody would have

161
00:08:04.959 --> 00:08:06.839
yelled out we love you, Jamie or something like that,

162
00:08:06.920 --> 00:08:08.879
or you would have just heard something. Somebody would have

163
00:08:08.959 --> 00:08:12.720
coughed or sneezed or something. The room's too dead. I

164
00:08:12.800 --> 00:08:15.560
see what Jamie was going for, and I think for

165
00:08:15.639 --> 00:08:17.439
what he was going for, it's a good version of that,

166
00:08:17.600 --> 00:08:20.720
but not on the list. And like I said, today's

167
00:08:20.720 --> 00:08:23.240
episode is not The specials are turable and I hate them.

168
00:08:23.279 --> 00:08:25.920
These are just the specials that also existed that didn't

169
00:08:25.920 --> 00:08:27.959
make the other two episodes and the other two lists.

170
00:08:27.959 --> 00:08:30.600
That's all. This is today Fortune Fimester. It was on

171
00:08:30.959 --> 00:08:34.480
Netflix in December, and I wrote, fine, Matthew Brossard, who

172
00:08:34.559 --> 00:08:36.240
was a guest on this show, I had a special

173
00:08:36.279 --> 00:08:40.279
on YouTube, and I wrote, funny, it's just not on

174
00:08:40.320 --> 00:08:43.279
the list. It's probably, you know, if I had to

175
00:08:43.360 --> 00:08:46.039
rank this group, maybe it's number one in this group.

176
00:08:46.159 --> 00:08:48.600
But I haven't ranked this group. This is just, you know,

177
00:08:48.840 --> 00:08:51.279
not on the list. Maybe it's the number thirty one

178
00:08:51.320 --> 00:08:52.679
special of the year, if you want to look at

179
00:08:52.720 --> 00:08:54.559
it that way. And I want to be fair to

180
00:08:54.600 --> 00:08:57.679
some specials that I haven't seen because I am recording

181
00:08:57.720 --> 00:09:01.080
these on December eighteenth to accommodate my skin, I have

182
00:09:01.200 --> 00:09:04.600
not seen Rose Mattafeo on Max Apergatsy's Christmas Eve special,

183
00:09:04.639 --> 00:09:06.759
which I imagine would be way up on my list.

184
00:09:06.799 --> 00:09:09.240
To Nate is solid and tends to be somebody that

185
00:09:09.279 --> 00:09:11.559
I am predisposed to like, So I imagine I'll write

186
00:09:11.600 --> 00:09:13.440
that in on pencil at some point down the road.

187
00:09:13.879 --> 00:09:16.240
The Netflix End of the Year roast thing haven't seen

188
00:09:16.279 --> 00:09:18.639
as I record Michelle Buttou's coming up on New Year's

189
00:09:18.679 --> 00:09:21.519
Eve and Alana Glazer on Hularius because why would the

190
00:09:21.559 --> 00:09:24.039
Hulu publicist ever get back to me about anything? So

191
00:09:24.360 --> 00:09:26.080
maybe it was good, maybe not, but they don't want

192
00:09:26.080 --> 00:09:28.399
to promote it. I'm fine not promoting it. So what

193
00:09:28.440 --> 00:09:30.639
do you think? Join us in the Facebook group, which

194
00:09:30.679 --> 00:09:33.320
is Daily Common News podcast group. You can agree, disagree,

195
00:09:33.360 --> 00:09:34.799
you can hate on me. You could love me. You'd

196
00:09:34.799 --> 00:09:37.039
be like John you nail that you got everything right.

197
00:09:37.080 --> 00:09:39.480
I agree with what was that fifty specials? And I

198
00:09:39.519 --> 00:09:42.559
agree totally on every word you said, and you have

199
00:09:42.639 --> 00:09:46.240
them all ranked appropriately. We concur and I would appreciate

200
00:09:46.279 --> 00:09:51.639
such notes. It's just a list. Don't get upset. It's

201
00:09:51.840 --> 00:09:55.080
just a list. Best of the year roast to Tom Brady.

202
00:09:55.480 --> 00:09:57.039
If you don't want to count that best of the

203
00:09:57.120 --> 00:10:01.320
year is David Tell's thirty five twenty seven minutes special

204
00:10:01.360 --> 00:10:03.799
that he put out. Those were my favorites, all right,

205
00:10:04.000 --> 00:10:04.600
see you tomorrow.