June 24, 2025

Andrew Schulz and the New York Times get feisty

Andrew Schulz and the New York Times get feisty
Apple Podcasts podcast player badge
Spotify podcast player badge
PocketCasts podcast player badge
Overcast podcast player badge
Castro podcast player badge
RSS Feed podcast player badge
Apple Podcasts podcast player iconSpotify podcast player iconPocketCasts podcast player iconOvercast podcast player iconCastro podcast player iconRSS Feed podcast player icon

Johnny Mack covers how politics and comedy intersect with a discussion featuring Theo Von and Democratic Rep. Ro Khanna on foreign affairs and AI. We also dive into a New York Times feature on comedian Andrew Schulz, exploring his rise to fame through internet stand-up clips and his controversial takes on sensitive topics.


00:17 Theo Von's Political Discussion
01:10 Andrew Schulz's Rise to Fame
04:28 Shane Gillis and the New Bro Comedy
06:28 Steph Tolev's Netflix Special
07:34 Amy Poehler's SNL Reflections
09:01 Martin Herlihy's Apple Campaign

Get the show without ads. Five bucks. For Apple users, hit the banner on your Apple podcasts app which says UNINTERRUPTED LISTENING. For Spotify or other players, visit caloroga.com/plus.

Contact John at john@thesharkdeck dot com
John’s free substack about the media: Media Thoughts is mcdpod.substack.com

DCN on Threads: https://www.threads.net/@dailycomedynews
https://linktr.ee/dailycomedynews

You can also support the show at www.buymeacoffee.com/dailycomedynews


Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/daily-comedy-news--4522158/support.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:11.039
Kalaroga Shock Media. Hey there, Johnny mack with for Daily

2
00:00:11.119 --> 00:00:15.800
Comedy News. You know, sometimes politics and comedy do intertwine.

3
00:00:15.880 --> 00:00:19.120
This was pretty interesting on Friday before the big news

4
00:00:19.120 --> 00:00:23.519
story over the weekend, THEO Vaughn had Democratic Representative Rocana

5
00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:27.039
from California on this past weekend to discussed several topics,

6
00:00:27.120 --> 00:00:31.480
including foreign affairs and AI. At one point on this

7
00:00:31.600 --> 00:00:34.759
past weekend, Kanna promoted the War Powers Resolution, which is

8
00:00:34.759 --> 00:00:38.520
a bipartisan bill that he had introduced with a Republican

9
00:00:38.960 --> 00:00:43.359
aimed at prohibiting US armed forces from unauthorized hostilities in Iran.

10
00:00:43.679 --> 00:00:45.719
THEO Vaughn said, Yeah, people say, well, you don't know

11
00:00:45.759 --> 00:00:47.640
a ton about the Middle East, Like that's fine. I

12
00:00:47.640 --> 00:00:49.679
don't want people I know, my friends getting called up.

13
00:00:49.719 --> 00:00:51.439
I don't want the children and my friends getting called

14
00:00:51.439 --> 00:00:53.640
over to die. I don't even understand how it's an option.

15
00:00:54.119 --> 00:00:56.479
Vaughn went on to tell Kana, it feels like we're

16
00:00:56.520 --> 00:00:58.960
just working for Israel. I feel like it was supposed

17
00:00:58.960 --> 00:01:01.399
to be America first, focusing on like what what are

18
00:01:01.439 --> 00:01:03.600
we doing to get things back into America right, like

19
00:01:03.640 --> 00:01:05.920
to increase the purpose of being American, refill our hearts

20
00:01:05.920 --> 00:01:08.560
with blood and makes us feel something again here and

21
00:01:08.599 --> 00:01:11.200
make us be excited about being an American. The New

22
00:01:11.319 --> 00:01:14.319
York Times had a big profile of Andrew Schultz over

23
00:01:14.359 --> 00:01:16.719
the weekend. There's also an audio version of it. I

24
00:01:16.719 --> 00:01:18.640
think you have to go to Apple Podcasts and look

25
00:01:18.640 --> 00:01:21.400
for the conversation. I'm not sure that's not on Apple,

26
00:01:21.439 --> 00:01:24.319
but regardless, I both read it and listened to it.

27
00:01:24.799 --> 00:01:28.000
It's kind of confrontational, it's pretty interesting, so it starts

28
00:01:28.040 --> 00:01:30.480
pretty basic. The Times ask Shaltz, in the last four

29
00:01:30.519 --> 00:01:32.319
or five years, you've really blown up. What has shifted

30
00:01:32.359 --> 00:01:35.159
to the culture to naby to come to prominence? Andrews said,

31
00:01:35.159 --> 00:01:38.000
when I started posting stuff on the internet, specifically stand up,

32
00:01:38.040 --> 00:01:39.439
things changed for me. I was trying to get an

33
00:01:39.519 --> 00:01:42.359
HBO special or back in the day, Netflix or Comedy Central.

34
00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:44.120
I was trying to get anything, but I couldn't get

35
00:01:44.120 --> 00:01:46.040
any motional with stand up. So out of desperation, I

36
00:01:46.040 --> 00:01:48.319
film my own special, pitch it to everybody nobody wanted,

37
00:01:48.359 --> 00:01:49.879
and I was like, I'm going to put this online.

38
00:01:50.159 --> 00:01:52.959
At that time, there was a sensitivity, especially in corporate America,

39
00:01:53.000 --> 00:01:55.200
about edginess and joke. So my gamble was maybe if

40
00:01:55.239 --> 00:01:57.120
I put this out on YouTube, there'll be an audience

41
00:01:57.120 --> 00:01:58.640
that likes this kind of comedy. I put it out,

42
00:01:58.640 --> 00:02:01.239
A weird thing happened everybody. They only watched twenty minutes.

43
00:02:01.359 --> 00:02:02.879
So I put out a twenty minute version of it

44
00:02:02.920 --> 00:02:04.359
in the next week, and I sold out a comedy

45
00:02:04.400 --> 00:02:05.959
club the next week, and I sawd out another one.

46
00:02:05.959 --> 00:02:07.599
I was like, Wow, there's something happening over here on

47
00:02:07.599 --> 00:02:11.479
the internet that's interesting, right that people don't watch full hours.

48
00:02:11.520 --> 00:02:14.680
Maybe everybody is me that twenty minute thing that makes

49
00:02:14.719 --> 00:02:17.280
a lot of sense to me as a consumer. Times,

50
00:02:17.360 --> 00:02:20.039
you obviously have clear ideas about what works with audiences.

51
00:02:20.080 --> 00:02:23.759
Does this create a temptation to pander Schaltz? Oftentimes what

52
00:02:23.800 --> 00:02:25.919
happens is yell of an opinion that's maybe a little different,

53
00:02:25.919 --> 00:02:28.280
and you'll be rebuked for that opinion for years, and

54
00:02:28.319 --> 00:02:30.080
then people start to come around. Then the same people

55
00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:33.080
that rebuked you will start echoing those sentiments with no accountability.

56
00:02:33.639 --> 00:02:36.080
Times you said you asked democrats to be on the podcast.

57
00:02:36.639 --> 00:02:39.360
Whom do you ask who said no? Pete Boota, Judge,

58
00:02:39.400 --> 00:02:42.319
Tim Walls, Kamala Harris, and then her team lies blatantly

59
00:02:42.319 --> 00:02:45.400
lies times about what Schultz about us reaching out, and

60
00:02:45.439 --> 00:02:47.680
it's wild to blatantly lie when not only did I

61
00:02:47.719 --> 00:02:51.120
reach out, Charlemagne, who's working with them, reached out, Mark Cuban,

62
00:02:51.159 --> 00:02:53.039
who's a surrogate, reached out, and we reached out, and

63
00:02:53.039 --> 00:02:56.120
they blatantly lie. Then when people write articles about it,

64
00:02:56.159 --> 00:02:57.919
they say, Andrew says he reached out to Kamala, but

65
00:02:57.960 --> 00:02:59.520
we reached out to the Kamala people, and they say

66
00:02:59.520 --> 00:03:01.439
that never happen, and so what's the reader supposed to

67
00:03:01.439 --> 00:03:04.280
interpret that? As? It's almost like calling me a liar.

68
00:03:05.280 --> 00:03:07.639
Then the interview gets into a bunch of Trump stuff,

69
00:03:07.680 --> 00:03:09.840
which is just too political for what we're doing here

70
00:03:09.840 --> 00:03:11.639
at Daily Comedy News. You can read it, you can

71
00:03:11.680 --> 00:03:15.240
listen to Andrew himself. Then they get into Andrew's use

72
00:03:15.280 --> 00:03:17.879
of the R word and another word I don't want

73
00:03:17.919 --> 00:03:20.599
to get involved with at all. So same note, you

74
00:03:20.639 --> 00:03:22.599
can listen to that, or you can read it yourself

75
00:03:22.599 --> 00:03:26.039
in the New York Times. Then this next point from Andrew,

76
00:03:26.080 --> 00:03:28.960
I think is stupid. They're going back and forth on

77
00:03:29.360 --> 00:03:32.000
which words Andrew is comfortable with and which he's not

78
00:03:32.039 --> 00:03:35.759
comfortable with. So Schultz says, have you heard of fire retardant?

79
00:03:35.879 --> 00:03:39.080
How do you feel about that word. Times correctly, retardant

80
00:03:39.080 --> 00:03:42.080
in that context means to slow something down. Schultz, and

81
00:03:42.120 --> 00:03:44.280
this is just a stupid point, goes, Should we make

82
00:03:44.319 --> 00:03:46.439
a different word for that? Come on, dude, come on,

83
00:03:46.680 --> 00:03:49.080
just come on jumping ahead, The Times writes. A few

84
00:03:49.120 --> 00:03:51.639
days later, Andrew and I talked again. And Andrew says,

85
00:03:51.680 --> 00:03:52.919
I was thinking about a lot of things from the

86
00:03:52.919 --> 00:03:55.000
conversation so far. Yeah, you had a good question I

87
00:03:55.039 --> 00:03:57.199
thought about all week, which was you don't say the

88
00:03:57.280 --> 00:03:59.240
N word or the K word, but you'll say other words.

89
00:03:59.280 --> 00:04:01.080
I was like, I think that's true. I didn't know

90
00:04:01.080 --> 00:04:02.520
what to think of it in the moment. Then he

91
00:04:02.599 --> 00:04:04.360
brought up the R word, and how I feel comfortable

92
00:04:04.400 --> 00:04:06.080
saying that one? I really thought about it. This is

93
00:04:06.120 --> 00:04:08.599
me trying to retrofit my knee jerk feelings on it.

94
00:04:08.680 --> 00:04:10.800
I think what makes a slur bad is it's a

95
00:04:10.840 --> 00:04:14.759
descripture plus organized violence as humans were like, that's bad.

96
00:04:14.800 --> 00:04:17.120
But if we don't remember that organized violence, or aren't

97
00:04:17.120 --> 00:04:18.759
taught about it, or it's too far in the past,

98
00:04:18.879 --> 00:04:20.600
we start to feel like it's not as heavy. I

99
00:04:20.600 --> 00:04:22.480
think that's why our reaction is different when it comes

100
00:04:22.519 --> 00:04:25.959
to Latino slurs or Asian slurs. Where's the organized violence?

101
00:04:26.639 --> 00:04:30.759
Interesting piece there? The Times also had an article titled

102
00:04:30.759 --> 00:04:33.879
what does Shane Gillis want to get away? With? No

103
00:04:34.040 --> 00:04:36.360
interview with Shane there, but they're mostly talking about tires,

104
00:04:36.360 --> 00:04:38.920
and they write Gillis brought a bro comedy fan base

105
00:04:38.959 --> 00:04:42.279
and endured a quasi cancelation with his Netflix sitcom Tires.

106
00:04:42.279 --> 00:04:44.519
He's trying to map the leap from edge Lord to

107
00:04:44.600 --> 00:04:47.959
the mainstream. His big break turned into an immediate road block,

108
00:04:48.000 --> 00:04:51.560
and he went from anonymity to cause cancel Libree overnight.

109
00:04:52.160 --> 00:04:54.439
In a way, Gillis's quick cycle of a sent crash

110
00:04:54.480 --> 00:04:56.720
and rebirth allowed him to begin addressing the obstacles that

111
00:04:56.759 --> 00:05:00.240
many of the manispheres current New Bro stars now. It's

112
00:05:00.360 --> 00:05:02.839
NU with like an umlock or something, the two dots

113
00:05:02.839 --> 00:05:05.079
above the U new Bro And I think this article

114
00:05:05.160 --> 00:05:08.120
used Newbro twice. I didn't know that was a term,

115
00:05:08.199 --> 00:05:10.759
and suddenly we're using it. But okay, I don't not

116
00:05:10.800 --> 00:05:13.879
even sure what it means, but that many of the

117
00:05:13.959 --> 00:05:16.759
man of spheres current Newbro stars are heading towards. Most

118
00:05:16.759 --> 00:05:19.920
are still building creative work largely outside the moral spheres

119
00:05:20.079 --> 00:05:23.439
of mainstream Hollywood and media, hence YouTube, podcast, comedy clubs

120
00:05:23.439 --> 00:05:25.439
and so on. But blessed with both an audience and

121
00:05:25.480 --> 00:05:27.920
something of a scarlet letter, Gillis is most interested in

122
00:05:27.920 --> 00:05:30.240
finding his way back to Fame's mainstream, or perhaps to

123
00:05:30.319 --> 00:05:33.199
remake it in his mold. They describe Shane's comedy as

124
00:05:33.199 --> 00:05:36.879
an affectionate portrayal of a cockshore simpleton. Gillis manages this

125
00:05:36.959 --> 00:05:38.839
in part because of how he uses his body. Now,

126
00:05:38.879 --> 00:05:40.639
this is really smart here. I thought they nailed this here.

127
00:05:40.879 --> 00:05:43.519
When he stands now, he's six foot four and lumberjack stirty.

128
00:05:43.800 --> 00:05:46.040
He tends to bend at the neck ever so slightly

129
00:05:46.079 --> 00:05:49.160
as to slightly minimize his presence, and Gillis soft steps

130
00:05:49.240 --> 00:05:52.879
rather than pounding around, giving him an apologetic mean am

131
00:05:52.920 --> 00:05:54.759
I E N. We're using the big words today New

132
00:05:54.839 --> 00:05:59.720
York Times. Overall, he exudes a kind of soothing sand

133
00:05:59.800 --> 00:06:04.360
laeran hangtogness. Somebody got the thesaurus out for this one.

134
00:06:04.879 --> 00:06:07.279
Undoubtedly a decade or two from now, and a tour

135
00:06:07.519 --> 00:06:09.519
director will find a way to radically remake him in

136
00:06:09.519 --> 00:06:13.000
a role of great tragic empathy. Did nobody in The

137
00:06:13.040 --> 00:06:16.120
Times editorial deportmagau use some normal words, dude, what is

138
00:06:16.160 --> 00:06:19.319
this article for now? Though it's masturbation jokes and also

139
00:06:19.360 --> 00:06:22.240
gestures with tires, Gilliss appears to be aiming for a

140
00:06:22.279 --> 00:06:25.439
post liberal restoration of mainstream comedy values to somewhere in

141
00:06:25.480 --> 00:06:28.000
the late eighties with a greater dose of self awareness.

142
00:06:28.319 --> 00:06:30.680
Steph Tolev has a special add on Netflix today. It

143
00:06:30.759 --> 00:06:34.120
is called Filth Queen. Filmed in Boston. It's produced by

144
00:06:34.199 --> 00:06:36.839
Bill Burr, who told Deadline the first time I saw

145
00:06:36.879 --> 00:06:38.920
Steph Tolev was a promotion video she had made for

146
00:06:38.959 --> 00:06:41.120
New York City show. I immediately fell in love with

147
00:06:41.160 --> 00:06:43.800
her in her comedy, one of the most uninhibited original

148
00:06:43.879 --> 00:06:46.759
voices out there today. I love everything about her. Speaking

149
00:06:46.759 --> 00:06:49.000
of Burr from the Boston Globe, somebody grabbed Burr on

150
00:06:49.040 --> 00:06:51.959
the street and they asked Burr about the Karen Reid case.

151
00:06:52.040 --> 00:06:54.800
Bill said he thought everyone was lying. He was told

152
00:06:54.879 --> 00:06:58.480
Karen was acquitted, and he'd said, wow. The Netflix release

153
00:06:58.480 --> 00:07:00.680
schedule is a little light right now. So we've got

154
00:07:00.680 --> 00:07:03.560
Steph today, Nate Jackson on July eighth, virdaes we'll have

155
00:07:03.600 --> 00:07:07.480
a special on July eighteenth, this one titled Food Volume.

156
00:07:08.319 --> 00:07:10.879
There's a poster for the special, which shows Virdas holding

157
00:07:10.920 --> 00:07:13.160
a lamp in his hand. The caption reads, Indian comedy

158
00:07:13.199 --> 00:07:17.000
is not Silent, It returns with fool volume. Here are

159
00:07:17.040 --> 00:07:20.000
your guest hosts for Jimmy Kimmelive this summer. They include

160
00:07:20.000 --> 00:07:23.759
Anthony Anderson, Nicole Buyer, Alan Cumming, christ De Stefano, Fortune Fimester,

161
00:07:24.000 --> 00:07:28.920
Jelly Roll, Diego, Luna Comeil Nan Jianni this one. I

162
00:07:29.000 --> 00:07:31.720
keep making crinkly face at this and I think I

163
00:07:31.720 --> 00:07:33.600
brought it up in the Facebook group Daily Comedy News

164
00:07:33.639 --> 00:07:37.680
Podcast Group. Amy Poehler was on her podcast and like

165
00:07:37.879 --> 00:07:41.360
just decided to bear her soul and nobody was asking

166
00:07:41.399 --> 00:07:44.399
her to bear her soul. Amy said that every comedian

167
00:07:44.399 --> 00:07:46.439
who has appeared on SNLL over the years has quote

168
00:07:46.480 --> 00:07:49.240
played people that we should not have played, and quote

169
00:07:49.360 --> 00:07:51.319
the part about getting older and being in comedies you

170
00:07:51.399 --> 00:07:53.959
have to like figure it out and oh, everything has

171
00:07:54.000 --> 00:07:56.839
an expiration date. It was even on SNL fifty when

172
00:07:56.839 --> 00:07:58.439
they had that segment which was like, here's all the

173
00:07:58.439 --> 00:08:00.759
ways we got things wrong, and they showed way inappropriate

174
00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:03.399
casting for people. We all played people that we shouldn't

175
00:08:03.399 --> 00:08:07.360
have played. I misappropriated, I appropriated. I didn't know I

176
00:08:08.040 --> 00:08:10.079
don't know what to make of this. We've all done

177
00:08:10.240 --> 00:08:12.839
things in the past that were, you know, we wish

178
00:08:12.879 --> 00:08:16.319
we could do over, and you know, as somebody like

179
00:08:16.399 --> 00:08:18.680
walking around going I can't believe maybe Polar did that

180
00:08:18.800 --> 00:08:20.319
role one time, Like I don't even know what she's

181
00:08:20.360 --> 00:08:22.920
burying her soul about. And are you gonna give back

182
00:08:22.920 --> 00:08:24.959
the money or just what we're supposed to go? Oh yeah,

183
00:08:24.959 --> 00:08:27.040
that thing you did, all right, that's cool. Like, I

184
00:08:27.079 --> 00:08:28.680
don't know even know why you're bringing this up. There

185
00:08:28.720 --> 00:08:31.279
wasn't any sort of Amy polar Gate. And at some

186
00:08:31.439 --> 00:08:34.559
point comedy is making fun of things. Otherwise you're just

187
00:08:34.600 --> 00:08:37.399
doing puns and knock knock jokes. It's almost always like

188
00:08:37.440 --> 00:08:39.840
an object of the joke that is being goofed on.

189
00:08:40.559 --> 00:08:42.840
She told Will Forte on her podcast. The best thing

190
00:08:42.840 --> 00:08:44.759
you can do is make repairs, learn for your mistakes,

191
00:08:44.799 --> 00:08:47.039
do better. It's all you can do that I agree with.

192
00:08:47.159 --> 00:08:49.320
I mean, you know, we make mistakes. We don't have

193
00:08:49.360 --> 00:08:51.639
tom machines move forward, But I don't I don't know

194
00:08:51.639 --> 00:08:54.399
what this is about. It seems like some sort of

195
00:08:54.639 --> 00:08:58.559
virtual signaling to the Hollywood crowd. But Amy's at a

196
00:08:58.600 --> 00:09:00.200
point in her career she doesn't need to do that,

197
00:09:00.320 --> 00:09:04.039
so I don't get it. Late Nighter reported that Martin Hurley,

198
00:09:04.279 --> 00:09:06.639
you know him from SNL and the police don't destroy guys,

199
00:09:07.159 --> 00:09:11.440
he had started a new Apple back to school campaign. Guys,

200
00:09:11.720 --> 00:09:14.440
it's June twenty fourth. We're doing back to school already.

201
00:09:15.080 --> 00:09:17.919
It only turned ninety degrees where I live two days ago,

202
00:09:18.440 --> 00:09:20.639
and we're doing back to school. Can we just enjoy

203
00:09:20.679 --> 00:09:23.600
summer anyway? The back to school campaign was aimed at

204
00:09:23.639 --> 00:09:26.840
college bound teenagers, but the seven minutes short was quietly

205
00:09:26.879 --> 00:09:30.679
pulled from Apple's YouTube channel after one day. In the video,

206
00:09:30.759 --> 00:09:33.480
Late Nighter says Hurley, he played a fictionalized version of

207
00:09:33.559 --> 00:09:37.559
himself guiding high schoolers through the parent presentation, designed to

208
00:09:37.559 --> 00:09:39.799
help students convince their parents to buy them a MacBook.

209
00:09:40.320 --> 00:09:42.559
Apple has not explained why they took the video down,

210
00:09:42.720 --> 00:09:46.440
but apparently some people on social media called the video cringe,

211
00:09:46.600 --> 00:09:50.240
out of touch, and even manipulative. And that is your

212
00:09:50.240 --> 00:09:52.399
comedy news for today. If you would like to program

213
00:09:52.399 --> 00:09:54.519
without commercial interruption or feed drops, you can go to

214
00:09:54.559 --> 00:09:57.200
caliroga dot com, slash plus, or if you're an Apple podcast,

215
00:09:57.240 --> 00:09:59.960
click up the benner that says uninterrupted listening five buff

216
00:10:00.000 --> 00:10:01.799
next a month, that stuff goes away. If you're on Apple,

217
00:10:01.799 --> 00:10:03.639
you get a thirty day free trial, So why wouldn't

218
00:10:03.679 --> 00:10:05.200
you just try it out for thirty days? And like

219
00:10:05.240 --> 00:10:07.679
I've joked before, and I'm totally joking. You know, if

220
00:10:07.679 --> 00:10:09.440
on day thirty one you forget to cancel it and

221
00:10:09.480 --> 00:10:11.720
I get five bucks, well, hey, what do you want

222
00:10:11.759 --> 00:10:13.559
from mek you tomorrow