Jan. 31, 2026

Comedy Podcast Neighborhoods - an analysis of who listens to what

Comedy Podcast Neighborhoods - an analysis of who listens to what

Johnny Mac, shares insights from AI analysis of listener behavior which reveals that comedy intersecting with politics, money, and elite institutions garners high engagement, while neutral coverage underperforms. The analysis indicates Daily Comedy News shares an audience with podcasts like 'Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend,' 'WTF with Marc Maron,' 'SmartLess,' and 'Fly on the Wall.' The community prefers personality-led, long-form conversations and established figures over emerging voices and high-energy content. Mac's audience values predictability, continuity, and in-depth reflections over chaotic and confrontational shows. The insights suggest podcast discovery is driven by short-form video platforms, while podcasts maintain retention.

Become a supporter of this podcast: https://www.spreaker.com/podcast/daily-comedy-news-with-johnny-mac--4522158/support.

Daily Comedy News is the number one comedy news podcast, delivering daily coverage of standup comedy, late night television, comedy specials, tours, and the business of comedy.

COMEDY SURVIVOR in the facebook group.

Contact John at John@thesharkdeck dot com 

Thanks to our sponsors!

Underdog Fantasy Promo Code DCN

For Uninterrupted Listening, use the Apple Podcast App and click the banner that says Uninterrupted Listening.  $4.99/month 

John's Substack about media is free.

WEBVTT

1
00:00:03.160 --> 00:00:12.880
Callaroga Shark Media. Hey there, I'm Johnnie Mack, and today

2
00:00:13.160 --> 00:00:15.000
I gotta talk about some other stuff as I've been

3
00:00:15.080 --> 00:00:17.839
talking about for the weekends of January. I just wanna

4
00:00:18.120 --> 00:00:20.199
just do some other things, experiment with the format a

5
00:00:20.239 --> 00:00:23.600
little bit. I was running the stats from twenty twenty

6
00:00:23.640 --> 00:00:26.320
five to see what was resonating or not. I'm always

7
00:00:26.320 --> 00:00:28.239
trying to grow the show and get more listeners in.

8
00:00:28.519 --> 00:00:31.079
I ran this through AI, and the AI tells me

9
00:00:31.120 --> 00:00:36.320
based on episode performance. Conflict driven stories outperform announcements. Comedy

10
00:00:36.359 --> 00:00:41.359
intersecting with politics, money or elite institutions drives engagement. Comedy

11
00:00:41.359 --> 00:00:46.039
intersecting with politics goes to both Colbert and Kimmel. Intersecting

12
00:00:46.079 --> 00:00:50.000
with money is the Rio Comedy Festival, and elite institutions

13
00:00:50.280 --> 00:00:52.960
is things around the White House or perhaps the Kennedy Center.

14
00:00:53.600 --> 00:00:57.920
The secondary episodes are comedians responding to comedians. So if

15
00:00:57.960 --> 00:01:00.479
I can find a story where you know, comedian calls

16
00:01:00.520 --> 00:01:04.239
out comedian, why those do really well and actually outperform

17
00:01:04.280 --> 00:01:09.480
the original event, that's interesting and what underperforms is neutral coverage.

18
00:01:09.560 --> 00:01:12.680
So you guys like me like a good fight, which

19
00:01:12.799 --> 00:01:17.000
brings me to today's topic of comedy neighborhoods. I use

20
00:01:17.040 --> 00:01:19.719
this website called refonic r E P h O N.

21
00:01:19.760 --> 00:01:23.799
I see. It's a podcast analytics platform that aggregates and

22
00:01:23.920 --> 00:01:28.159
models listener behavior. They pull it from the Apple podcast data.

23
00:01:28.319 --> 00:01:31.920
But what they try to do is visualize relationships between shows.

24
00:01:32.239 --> 00:01:34.840
They create this like really cool graphic where you'll see,

25
00:01:34.879 --> 00:01:37.000
like if I type in daily Coming News, they'll be

26
00:01:37.159 --> 00:01:40.840
lines connecting to other shows. So they kind of map

27
00:01:40.840 --> 00:01:42.640
it out the way they map out a star chart

28
00:01:42.640 --> 00:01:45.200
on your favorite science fiction show. So here in the middle,

29
00:01:45.280 --> 00:01:47.640
I see daily comedy news, and then there are lines

30
00:01:47.680 --> 00:01:50.359
to different shows, so I see like a direct line.

31
00:01:50.879 --> 00:01:53.840
One of the closest things is the Last Laugh podcast

32
00:01:53.959 --> 00:01:57.719
that makes sense. Lewis Black's Rant cast to the Netflix

33
00:01:57.799 --> 00:02:00.799
is a joke podcast. Then some longer line things like

34
00:02:00.879 --> 00:02:04.319
Conan O'Brien and Club Random and the Weekly Show even

35
00:02:04.359 --> 00:02:07.040
to Late Night with Seth Myers. There's an overlap between

36
00:02:07.040 --> 00:02:09.560
people who like the Seth Meyers podcast and me. Now

37
00:02:09.560 --> 00:02:12.840
that's funny. If we zoom out, we go deeper into

38
00:02:12.879 --> 00:02:16.280
the universe. Out past the Seth Myers orbit is the

39
00:02:16.360 --> 00:02:19.039
Cobert orbit. If you go out far enough, you'll go

40
00:02:19.120 --> 00:02:22.960
to pot Save America. That's interesting. But then even within

41
00:02:23.280 --> 00:02:26.199
these if you zoom in here, now here is what

42
00:02:26.319 --> 00:02:30.000
they call a neighborhood. And I have tenuous connections to

43
00:02:30.080 --> 00:02:32.439
some of these shows, but all living in what they

44
00:02:32.479 --> 00:02:36.240
call the same comedy neighborhood are Two Bears, One Cave

45
00:02:36.360 --> 00:02:40.360
and Bad Friends and Whiskey Ginger, Bill Burr, Tosh Are

46
00:02:40.400 --> 00:02:43.080
You Garbage? So like you could see all those shows

47
00:02:43.199 --> 00:02:45.960
kind of sharing an audience, and I only somewhat share

48
00:02:45.960 --> 00:02:48.759
an audience with them. So as we break this down,

49
00:02:48.800 --> 00:02:50.400
and again, I was looking at this because I'm always

50
00:02:50.439 --> 00:02:52.360
trying to grow the show, and I wanted to figure out,

51
00:02:52.400 --> 00:02:54.840
all right, people who like this show also like what show?

52
00:02:54.840 --> 00:02:56.719
Maybe I should talk about that stuff a little bit more.

53
00:02:56.840 --> 00:02:59.280
And you can go to this thing. It's rafonic dot com.

54
00:02:59.319 --> 00:03:01.639
Just look up comedy neighborhoods and it explains that each

55
00:03:01.719 --> 00:03:05.800
line represents shared subscribers. Distance matters. Shows that appear close

56
00:03:05.840 --> 00:03:08.840
together share a higher percentage of the same listeners. Clusters

57
00:03:08.879 --> 00:03:11.719
form when many shows share overlapping audiences. So that list

58
00:03:11.719 --> 00:03:14.360
I just gave you of like Whiskey, Junior and Bill,

59
00:03:14.400 --> 00:03:16.360
They're all sharing an audience together. And I'm a little

60
00:03:16.400 --> 00:03:19.240
further away from them. So what did Johnny Mack learn

61
00:03:19.840 --> 00:03:22.800
AI and tells me? The first clear observation is that

62
00:03:22.919 --> 00:03:26.080
daily comedy news does not cluster with stand up comedy feeds,

63
00:03:26.159 --> 00:03:31.560
Joe compilations, improv podcasts, or TikTok driven comedy properties. Instead,

64
00:03:32.080 --> 00:03:35.360
it sits inside a dense cluster of talk based, personality

65
00:03:35.439 --> 00:03:40.520
led legacy comedian podcasts. The closest and most consistently linked

66
00:03:40.599 --> 00:03:44.719
shows include Conan O'Brien Needs a Friend. The show emphasizes

67
00:03:44.800 --> 00:03:49.280
extended conversation, recurring co hosts, and minimal topical urgency. WTF

68
00:03:49.280 --> 00:03:52.800
with Mark Maren, known for introspective interviews, long run times,

69
00:03:52.840 --> 00:03:57.039
and a focus on creative process SmartLess I should probably

70
00:03:57.039 --> 00:03:58.960
talk about those guys a little bit more. While lighter

71
00:03:59.000 --> 00:04:02.199
in tone, it is structural, similar long conversations, familiar hosts

72
00:04:02.240 --> 00:04:05.159
and minimal emphasis on topical comedy. And Fly on the

73
00:04:05.199 --> 00:04:08.840
Wall with Dana Carvey and David Spade, which interesting enough

74
00:04:08.919 --> 00:04:12.000
talk about rhads not taken. I was with Cadence thirteen

75
00:04:12.000 --> 00:04:14.120
when they did that deal. I still don't know why

76
00:04:14.120 --> 00:04:16.480
they didn't ask me to produce that. It's fine, I'm

77
00:04:16.519 --> 00:04:18.519
not upset, and my mom was pretty sick at that time,

78
00:04:18.519 --> 00:04:20.199
so that might have been the choice that maybe my

79
00:04:20.319 --> 00:04:22.800
head wasn't totally in the game. That could be the reason.

80
00:04:23.240 --> 00:04:24.839
And I don't mean that as a dick. My boss

81
00:04:24.920 --> 00:04:27.920
was very very very very very I can't say very

82
00:04:27.959 --> 00:04:30.879
enough times, very very very kind. It gave me a

83
00:04:30.920 --> 00:04:32.879
lot of rope and a lot of space to just

84
00:04:33.000 --> 00:04:35.160
do what I needed to do at that time. So

85
00:04:35.199 --> 00:04:36.839
it could have been that that they didn't want to

86
00:04:37.240 --> 00:04:40.000
burden me with having to produce another show. Because I

87
00:04:40.040 --> 00:04:41.879
do play hard, so if you give me work, I

88
00:04:41.879 --> 00:04:44.560
will do it so as I do out loud therapy here.

89
00:04:44.639 --> 00:04:46.879
That might have been an act of kindness. But on paper,

90
00:04:47.600 --> 00:04:50.959
I'm the person you know, age wise or resume wise,

91
00:04:51.160 --> 00:04:53.519
I'm the person you probably would ask to produce such

92
00:04:53.519 --> 00:04:56.079
a show regardless. We share an audience to daily comedy

93
00:04:56.079 --> 00:04:59.120
news and Fly on the Wall, a nostalgia driven interview show.

94
00:04:59.560 --> 00:05:04.000
Now it's interesting here is Maren's older than me, Carvey's

95
00:05:04.040 --> 00:05:07.480
older than me. How old Spade he's older than me? Right? Yeah,

96
00:05:07.519 --> 00:05:10.399
Spade's sixty one. I'm fifty six. In case you're curious,

97
00:05:11.040 --> 00:05:14.839
I think Jason Bateman is my age. Bateman is fifty

98
00:05:14.879 --> 00:05:17.720
six might be fifty seven by the time you hear this,

99
00:05:17.759 --> 00:05:20.480
depending on what I deployed it. January fourteenth, nineteen sixty

100
00:05:20.560 --> 00:05:23.639
nine is his birthday. Happy Birthday, Jason Bateman. So yeah,

101
00:05:23.720 --> 00:05:27.040
all right, So it makes sense that people who like

102
00:05:27.439 --> 00:05:30.720
dudes in their fifties and sixties like other dudes in

103
00:05:30.759 --> 00:05:32.800
their fifties. Does that all makes sense to me? Like,

104
00:05:32.839 --> 00:05:36.160
I don't expect the TikTok comedian fans to dig what

105
00:05:36.160 --> 00:05:38.839
I'm doing here. As I was talking with Mike Chisholm

106
00:05:38.839 --> 00:05:41.800
from The Letterman podcast recently, I was like, you know,

107
00:05:41.879 --> 00:05:43.879
we're sitting here talking about a show that came out

108
00:05:43.959 --> 00:05:47.399
forty years ago. AI tells me, also appearing within the

109
00:05:47.560 --> 00:05:50.519
cluster or shows like Rob Low, Good Hang, and other

110
00:05:50.680 --> 00:05:55.759
personality led conversation podcast that prioritize familiarity and low conflict listening.

111
00:05:56.240 --> 00:05:58.959
The data indicates that listeners who subscribe to DCN are

112
00:05:59.000 --> 00:06:02.240
the same listeners who's subscribe to those shows. That implies

113
00:06:02.240 --> 00:06:05.360
a set of preferences to this is you guys. You

114
00:06:05.439 --> 00:06:08.959
guys subscribe to hosts, not formats. Thank you. I take

115
00:06:09.000 --> 00:06:12.720
that as high compliment. They value continuity over novelty. They

116
00:06:12.759 --> 00:06:17.439
tolerate long run times in conversational pacing. They're comfortable with analysis, reflection,

117
00:06:17.560 --> 00:06:21.279
and repetition, which reminds me one time, Joe Quoitnaw, I'm

118
00:06:21.279 --> 00:06:24.240
not going to do that today. Oh this is interesting.

119
00:06:24.519 --> 00:06:28.519
This cluster skews heavily towards comedian and entertainers whose primary

120
00:06:28.560 --> 00:06:32.720
career breakthroughs occurred before the rise of social media comedy discovery.

121
00:06:33.040 --> 00:06:36.759
These are not emerging voices. These are established figures using

122
00:06:36.839 --> 00:06:41.759
podcasts retain and monetize existing audiences. Very interesting. I've got

123
00:06:41.759 --> 00:06:47.160
more analysis after this break. Continuing our look at the

124
00:06:47.240 --> 00:06:51.439
Daily Comedy News comedy neighborhood where I find myself, AYI

125
00:06:51.560 --> 00:06:54.480
tells me. The map shows adjacency to a second, smaller

126
00:06:54.600 --> 00:06:59.519
cluster focused on comedy as process rather than performance. Shows

127
00:06:59.600 --> 00:07:02.120
like Block That's Neil Brennan's Pod and Good One appear

128
00:07:02.160 --> 00:07:06.199
as secondary neighbors. These podcasts explicitly analyze how jokes are written,

129
00:07:06.240 --> 00:07:08.879
how bits evolve, and how comedians think about craft. They're

130
00:07:08.879 --> 00:07:11.839
not built for casual listening. Their presence in the Daily

131
00:07:11.879 --> 00:07:14.480
Comedy News neighborhood suggests that a meaningful portion of the

132
00:07:14.480 --> 00:07:18.319
audience is interested in how comedy works, not just consuming it.

133
00:07:18.720 --> 00:07:21.040
That makes sense to me. I would imagine that is

134
00:07:21.120 --> 00:07:24.199
one of the reasons you pick this particular program. A

135
00:07:24.319 --> 00:07:28.680
third nearby grouping consists of comfort oriented conversational podcasts. Again,

136
00:07:28.759 --> 00:07:31.079
I will take that as a compliment. I'm just trying

137
00:07:31.079 --> 00:07:33.759
to keep you company here. I'm not a comedian. I've

138
00:07:33.800 --> 00:07:36.079
never performed comedy. I don't claim to be a comedian.

139
00:07:36.120 --> 00:07:39.639
I don't claim to be funny. Hopefully I'm amusing at times.

140
00:07:39.639 --> 00:07:41.600
There seem to be some recurring bits that people like,

141
00:07:41.680 --> 00:07:45.040
but I'm obviously not here shucking jokes. The AI says

142
00:07:45.040 --> 00:07:48.399
these are low stake shows designed for passive listening. Their

143
00:07:48.399 --> 00:07:51.519
connection to DCN reinforces the idea that this audience values

144
00:07:51.600 --> 00:07:56.040
predictability and routine. Finally, at the outer edges of the cluster,

145
00:07:56.439 --> 00:08:00.759
remnants of legacy late night television ecosystems appear. Podcasts tied

146
00:08:00.800 --> 00:08:03.079
to the daily show, late night hosts, and political comedy

147
00:08:03.079 --> 00:08:06.079
are connected, but with weaker overlap. Equally important is what

148
00:08:06.160 --> 00:08:09.199
does not appear near daily comedy news. This is interesting.

149
00:08:09.959 --> 00:08:13.000
There's little to no proximity to stand up album feeds,

150
00:08:13.160 --> 00:08:16.920
short form comedy podcasts, or personality driven, shock or argument

151
00:08:16.959 --> 00:08:20.680
based shows. Those live in separate neighborhoods with different listener behavior.

152
00:08:21.160 --> 00:08:23.759
The data suggests that daily comedy news serves an audience

153
00:08:23.800 --> 00:08:28.480
that uses comedy podcasts as contextual media, not entertainment first content.

154
00:08:28.839 --> 00:08:32.879
These listeners are tracking an industry, not chasing laughs. Some

155
00:08:32.960 --> 00:08:36.120
good analysis here by the AI. This data indicates that

156
00:08:36.240 --> 00:08:40.600
podcast subscriptions, unlike social media follows, are conservative. Listeners are

157
00:08:40.600 --> 00:08:43.600
reluctant to commit time to unfamiliar voices unless trust has

158
00:08:43.600 --> 00:08:46.960
already been established elsewhere. In effect, discovery has moved out

159
00:08:46.960 --> 00:08:51.240
of podcasts. Short form video platforms now handle discovery, podcasts

160
00:08:51.240 --> 00:08:54.559
handle retention. That division explains why comedians who break on

161
00:08:54.600 --> 00:08:57.519
TikTok or Instagram often struggle to translate that audience into

162
00:08:57.519 --> 00:09:02.240
podcast subscriptions, while legacy comedian maintain strong audio audiences even

163
00:09:02.279 --> 00:09:05.759
as their television relevance declines. Another conclusion from the cluster

164
00:09:05.799 --> 00:09:10.440
structure is tone tolerance. Listeners in this neighborhood tolerate introspection, repetition,

165
00:09:10.919 --> 00:09:13.399
and even periods of low energy Hi I'm Johnny Mac.

166
00:09:14.240 --> 00:09:18.759
What they do not tolerate is chaos. Podcasts built on confrontation, outrage,

167
00:09:18.840 --> 00:09:22.039
or aggressive performance styles are structurally absent from this cluster

168
00:09:22.720 --> 00:09:25.559
that makes sense. I'm not a yeller and screamer. The

169
00:09:25.600 --> 00:09:28.679
dominant cluster around Daily Comedy News reflects listeners who likely

170
00:09:28.720 --> 00:09:31.879
aged out of appointment television and high energy stand up consumption.

171
00:09:32.399 --> 00:09:34.720
These listeners still on comedy, but in a format that

172
00:09:34.799 --> 00:09:38.919
integrates into daily life rather than demanding attention. Interesting stuff there,

173
00:09:39.399 --> 00:09:42.720
and that's today's episode of Daily Comedy News. I'll see

174
00:09:42.720 --> 00:09:43.159
you tomorrow.